Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Omni Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Omni Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Omni Engineering Group holds $45.4M in lifetime obligations with a 83.8% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Omni Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $45.4M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Omni Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 83.8%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Omni Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Navy
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Omni Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$45.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$13.9M
Recompete Win Rate:83.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:8
Average Award Cycle:53 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541511
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Omni Engineering Group
UEI: APR9D80M53S0 • Washington, WV
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX