Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Omni Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Omni Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Omni Engineering Group holds $45.4M in lifetime obligations with a 83.8% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Omni Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $45.4M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Omni Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 83.8%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Omni Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Navy

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Omni Engineering Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$45.4M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$13.9M

Recompete Win Rate:83.8%

Active Prime Task Orders:8

Average Award Cycle:53 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541511

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512