Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Omni Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Omni Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Omni Engineering Group holds $42.6M in lifetime obligations with a 82.1% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Omni Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $42.6M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Omni Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 82.1%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Omni Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Omni Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$42.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$14.2M
Recompete Win Rate:82.1%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:51 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):336992
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Omni Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence