Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

PACMED CLINICS vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between PACMED CLINICS and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: PACMED CLINICS holds $1.56B in lifetime obligations with a 83.3% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•PACMED CLINICS Lifetime Spend: $1.56B
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•PACMED CLINICS Recompete Win %: 83.3%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•PACMED CLINICS Top Agency: Department of Defense
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

PACMED CLINICS

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.56B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$547.7M
Recompete Win Rate:83.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:1
Average Award Cycle:57 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
PACMED CLINICS
UEI: NB7GJWCMRQY3 • Washington, WA
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX