Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

PACMED CLINICS vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between PACMED CLINICS and THE BOEING COMPANY: PACMED CLINICS holds $1.56B in lifetime obligations with a 83.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•PACMED CLINICS Lifetime Spend: $1.56B
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•PACMED CLINICS Recompete Win %: 83.3%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•PACMED CLINICS Top Agency: Department of Defense
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

PACMED CLINICS

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.56B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$547.7M
Recompete Win Rate:83.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:1
Average Award Cycle:57 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
PACMED CLINICS
UEI: NB7GJWCMRQY3 • Washington, WA
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA