Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Pinnacle Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Pinnacle Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Pinnacle Applied Sciences holds $44.3M in lifetime obligations with a 79.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

Pinnacle Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $44.3M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
Pinnacle Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 79.9%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
Pinnacle Applied Sciences Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Pinnacle Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$44.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$14.1M
Recompete Win Rate:79.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:24
Average Award Cycle:48 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541810
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Pinnacle Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence