Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Pinnacle Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Pinnacle Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Pinnacle Applied Sciences holds $33.4M in lifetime obligations with a 77.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Pinnacle Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $33.4M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Pinnacle Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 77.7%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Pinnacle Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Army
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Pinnacle Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$33.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$14.0M
Recompete Win Rate:77.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:27
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541110
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Pinnacle Applied Sciences
UEI: LR4H94YVVFNP • Austin, TX
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX