Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Pinnacle Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Pinnacle Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Pinnacle Applied Sciences holds $3.2M in lifetime obligations with a 93.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Pinnacle Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $3.2M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Pinnacle Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 93.9%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Pinnacle Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Treasury

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Pinnacle Applied Sciences

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$3.2M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$1.2M

Recompete Win Rate:93.9%

Active Prime Task Orders:23

Average Award Cycle:56 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):336414

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512