Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Pinnacle Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Pinnacle Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Pinnacle Consulting Group holds $6.9M in lifetime obligations with a 90.1% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Pinnacle Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $6.9M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Pinnacle Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 90.1%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Pinnacle Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Air Force
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Pinnacle Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$6.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$2.3M
Recompete Win Rate:90.1%
Active Prime Task Orders:8
Average Award Cycle:48 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561110
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Pinnacle Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence