Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Pinnacle Global Services vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Pinnacle Global Services and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Pinnacle Global Services holds $424.2M in lifetime obligations with a 82.5% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Pinnacle Global Services Lifetime Spend: $424.2M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Pinnacle Global Services Recompete Win %: 82.5%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Pinnacle Global Services Top Agency: Department of Defense
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Pinnacle Global Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$424.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$114.5M
Recompete Win Rate:82.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:136
Average Award Cycle:41 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541990
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Pinnacle Global Services vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence