Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Polaris Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Polaris Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Polaris Engineering Group holds $99.1M in lifetime obligations with a 95.5% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•Polaris Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $99.1M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
•Polaris Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 95.5%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Polaris Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Polaris Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$99.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$27.3M
Recompete Win Rate:95.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:77
Average Award Cycle:44 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541990
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512