Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Quantum Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Quantum Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Quantum Applied Sciences holds $40.6M in lifetime obligations with a 86.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Quantum Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $40.6M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Quantum Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 86.6%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Quantum Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of Energy
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Quantum Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$40.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.0M
Recompete Win Rate:86.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:14
Average Award Cycle:38 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541990
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Quantum Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence