Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Quantum Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Quantum Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Quantum Engineering Group holds $36.4M in lifetime obligations with a 73.9% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Quantum Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $36.4M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Quantum Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 73.9%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Quantum Engineering Group Top Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Quantum Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$36.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$12.3M
Recompete Win Rate:73.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:4
Average Award Cycle:56 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):332994
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Quantum Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence