Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Quantum Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Quantum Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Quantum Engineering Group holds $27.5M in lifetime obligations with a 87.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Quantum Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $27.5M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Quantum Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 87.9%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Quantum Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Army
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Quantum Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$27.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.0M
Recompete Win Rate:87.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:47 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):622110
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Quantum Engineering Group
UEI: GUD0RPD0AZB6 • Washington, OH
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX