Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

RESEARCH MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS INC vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between RESEARCH MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS INC and THE BOEING COMPANY: RESEARCH MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS INC holds $143.4M in lifetime obligations with a 79.9% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•RESEARCH MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS INC Lifetime Spend: $143.4M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•RESEARCH MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS INC Recompete Win %: 79.9%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•RESEARCH MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS INC Top Agency: Office of Personnel Management
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

RESEARCH MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS INC

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$143.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$50.2M
Recompete Win Rate:79.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:1
Average Award Cycle:35 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541519
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
RESEARCH MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS INC
UEI: LREZCR4GTFM5 • Washington, GA
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA