Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE and THE BOEING COMPANY: RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE holds $1.24B in lifetime obligations with a 83.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE Lifetime Spend: $1.24B
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE Recompete Win %: 83.0%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE Top Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.24B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$434.2M
Recompete Win Rate:83.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:21
Average Award Cycle:45 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541611
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence