Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

RIGHT TO CARE ZAMBIA LIMITED vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between RIGHT TO CARE ZAMBIA LIMITED and THE BOEING COMPANY: RIGHT TO CARE ZAMBIA LIMITED holds $96.6M in lifetime obligations with a 90.7% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•RIGHT TO CARE ZAMBIA LIMITED Lifetime Spend: $96.6M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•RIGHT TO CARE ZAMBIA LIMITED Recompete Win %: 90.7%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•RIGHT TO CARE ZAMBIA LIMITED Top Agency: Agency for International Development
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

RIGHT TO CARE ZAMBIA LIMITED

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$96.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$33.8M
Recompete Win Rate:90.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:1
Average Award Cycle:37 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541611
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
RIGHT TO CARE ZAMBIA LIMITED
UEI: M5NUW7LQ7HA8 • Washington, DC
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA