Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
ROLLING BAY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between ROLLING BAY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: ROLLING BAY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY holds $43.8M in lifetime obligations with a 81.5% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•ROLLING BAY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $43.8M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•ROLLING BAY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Recompete Win %: 81.5%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•ROLLING BAY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Energy
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →ROLLING BAY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$43.8M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$15.3M
Recompete Win Rate:81.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:1
Average Award Cycle:47 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541519
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512