Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Shield Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Shield Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Shield Applied Sciences holds $466.0M in lifetime obligations with a 79.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Shield Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $466.0M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Shield Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 79.9%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Shield Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Army
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Shield Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$466.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$165.0M
Recompete Win Rate:79.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:167
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541990
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Shield Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence