Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Shield Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Shield Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Shield Applied Sciences holds $466.0M in lifetime obligations with a 79.9% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Shield Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $466.0M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Shield Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 79.9%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Shield Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Army
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Shield Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$466.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$165.0M
Recompete Win Rate:79.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:167
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541990
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Shield Applied Sciences
UEI: PJ48JSQWKK6Q • McLean, VA
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA