Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Shield Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Shield Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Shield Consulting Group holds $29.8M in lifetime obligations with a 93.5% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $154.66B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Shield Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $29.8M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $154.66B
•Shield Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 93.5%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•Shield Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Shield Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$29.8M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.2M
Recompete Win Rate:93.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:24
Average Award Cycle:59 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):332993
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$154.66B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$54.13B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Shield Consulting Group
UEI: DLWLYPLBW6L6 • Washington, WA
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
UEI: FYHNA5WC8XD7 • Washington, NM