Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Shield Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Shield Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Shield Consulting Group holds $18.2M in lifetime obligations with a 73.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•Shield Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $18.2M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Shield Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 73.6%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Shield Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Navy
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Shield Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$18.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$4.6M
Recompete Win Rate:73.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:6
Average Award Cycle:33 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):332993
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512