Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Shield Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Shield Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Shield Consulting Group holds $30.4M in lifetime obligations with a 84.1% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Shield Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $30.4M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B

•Shield Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 84.1%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•Shield Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Defense

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Shield Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$30.4M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.9M

Recompete Win Rate:84.1%

Active Prime Task Orders:20

Average Award Cycle:33 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541990

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:78

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512