Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Shield Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Shield Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Shield Consulting Group holds $25.5M in lifetime obligations with a 89.2% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.
•Shield Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $25.5M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
•Shield Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 89.2%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•Shield Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Shield Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$25.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.6M
Recompete Win Rate:89.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:23
Average Award Cycle:56 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561210
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512