Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Shield Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Shield Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Shield Consulting Group holds $25.5M in lifetime obligations with a 89.2% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Shield Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $25.5M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Shield Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 89.2%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Shield Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Shield Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$25.5M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.6M

Recompete Win Rate:89.2%

Active Prime Task Orders:23

Average Award Cycle:56 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):561210

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512