Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Shield Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Shield Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Shield Consulting Group holds $25.5M in lifetime obligations with a 89.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Shield Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $25.5M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
•Shield Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 89.2%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Shield Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Shield Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$25.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.6M
Recompete Win Rate:89.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:23
Average Award Cycle:56 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561210
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512