Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Shield Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Shield Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Shield Engineering Group holds $3.1M in lifetime obligations with a 90.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Shield Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $3.1M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Shield Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 90.0%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Shield Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Homeland Security
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Shield Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$3.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$978K
Recompete Win Rate:90.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:8
Average Award Cycle:58 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541330
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Shield Engineering Group
UEI: X5CXH5ZXWYXJ • Washington, IA
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA