Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Shield Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Shield Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Shield Engineering Group holds $39.1M in lifetime obligations with a 85.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Shield Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $39.1M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Shield Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 85.2%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Shield Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Army
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Shield Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$39.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$13.4M
Recompete Win Rate:85.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:15
Average Award Cycle:36 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541614
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Shield Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence