Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Shield Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Shield Global Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Shield Global Services holds $45.1M in lifetime obligations with a 79.4% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Shield Global Services Lifetime Spend: $45.1M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Shield Global Services Recompete Win %: 79.4%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Shield Global Services Top Agency: Department of the Air Force
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Shield Global Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$45.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$11.8M
Recompete Win Rate:79.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:8
Average Award Cycle:46 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334519
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Shield Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence