Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Shield Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Shield Global Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Shield Global Services holds $45.1M in lifetime obligations with a 79.4% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Shield Global Services Lifetime Spend: $45.1M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Shield Global Services Recompete Win %: 79.4%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Shield Global Services Top Agency: Department of the Air Force
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Shield Global Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$45.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$11.8M
Recompete Win Rate:79.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:8
Average Award Cycle:46 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334519
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Shield Global Services
UEI: SQRPMJPKQC28 • Washington, PA
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA