Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Shield Management Solutions vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Shield Management Solutions and THE BOEING COMPANY: Shield Management Solutions holds $46.4M in lifetime obligations with a 89.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Shield Management Solutions Lifetime Spend: $46.4M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Shield Management Solutions Recompete Win %: 89.3%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Shield Management Solutions Top Agency: Department of the Navy
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Shield Management Solutions

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$46.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$11.8M
Recompete Win Rate:89.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:22
Average Award Cycle:58 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561422
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Shield Management Solutions
UEI: ECY4CD80TC53 • Washington, ND
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA