Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Shield Management Solutions vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Shield Management Solutions and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Shield Management Solutions holds $42.4M in lifetime obligations with a 80.0% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Shield Management Solutions Lifetime Spend: $42.4M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Shield Management Solutions Recompete Win %: 80.0%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Shield Management Solutions Top Agency: Department of the Army
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Shield Management Solutions

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$42.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$12.6M
Recompete Win Rate:80.0%
Active Prime Task Orders:19
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541810
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Shield Management Solutions
UEI: KEA1BP1AU3AP • Washington, RI
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX