Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Sierra Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Sierra Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Sierra Consulting Group holds $37.1M in lifetime obligations with a 87.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•Sierra Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $37.1M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Sierra Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 87.9%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Sierra Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Air Force
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Sierra Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$37.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$14.6M
Recompete Win Rate:87.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541511
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512