Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Sierra Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Sierra Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Sierra Consulting Group holds $37.1M in lifetime obligations with a 87.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Sierra Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $37.1M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Sierra Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 87.9%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Sierra Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Air Force

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Sierra Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$37.1M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$14.6M

Recompete Win Rate:87.9%

Active Prime Task Orders:28

Average Award Cycle:54 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541511

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512