Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Sierra Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Sierra Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Sierra Consulting Group holds $577.9M in lifetime obligations with a 89.8% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Sierra Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $577.9M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B

•Sierra Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 89.8%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•Sierra Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Air Force

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Sierra Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$577.9M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$236.5M

Recompete Win Rate:89.8%

Active Prime Task Orders:193

Average Award Cycle:34 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541370

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:78

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512