Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Sierra Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Sierra Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Sierra Consulting Group holds $577.9M in lifetime obligations with a 89.8% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Sierra Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $577.9M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Sierra Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 89.8%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Sierra Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Air Force
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Sierra Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$577.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$236.5M
Recompete Win Rate:89.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:193
Average Award Cycle:34 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541370
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Sierra Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence