Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Sierra Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Sierra Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Sierra Engineering Group holds $25.3M in lifetime obligations with a 94.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $154.66B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Sierra Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $25.3M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $154.66B
•Sierra Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 94.6%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•Sierra Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Sierra Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$25.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$11.2M
Recompete Win Rate:94.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:25
Average Award Cycle:38 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561720
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$154.66B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$54.13B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Sierra Engineering Group
UEI: NE3W9JAP2EEQ • Washington, DC
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
UEI: FYHNA5WC8XD7 • Washington, NM