Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Sierra Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Sierra Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Sierra Engineering Group holds $109.0M in lifetime obligations with a 88.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.
•Sierra Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $109.0M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
•Sierra Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 88.6%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•Sierra Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Army
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Sierra Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$109.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$43.5M
Recompete Win Rate:88.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:149
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):492110
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512