Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Strategic Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Strategic Applied Sciences holds $383.5M in lifetime obligations with a 90.9% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Strategic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $383.5M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Strategic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 90.9%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Strategic Applied Sciences Top Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Strategic Applied Sciences
Total Lifetime Obligations:$383.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$161.7M
Recompete Win Rate:90.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:32
Average Award Cycle:36 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541370
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512