Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Strategic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Strategic Applied Sciences holds $27.4M in lifetime obligations with a 86.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Strategic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $27.4M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Strategic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 86.6%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Strategic Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of Justice
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Strategic Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$27.4M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$5.8M
Recompete Win Rate:86.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:11
Average Award Cycle:43 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561110
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Strategic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence