Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Strategic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Strategic Applied Sciences holds $14.8M in lifetime obligations with a 90.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Strategic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $14.8M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Strategic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 90.7%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Strategic Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Strategic Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$14.8M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$3.1M
Recompete Win Rate:90.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:56 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541715
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Strategic Applied Sciences
UEI: KGLZ3DKMP8ZV • Washington, KS
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX