Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Strategic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Strategic Applied Sciences holds $23.6M in lifetime obligations with a 82.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

Strategic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $23.6M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
Strategic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 82.9%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
Strategic Applied Sciences Top Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Strategic Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$23.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.7M
Recompete Win Rate:82.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:25
Average Award Cycle:47 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334519
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Strategic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence