Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Strategic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Strategic Applied Sciences holds $18.5M in lifetime obligations with a 95.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Strategic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $18.5M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Strategic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 95.9%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Strategic Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Army
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Strategic Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$18.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$7.5M
Recompete Win Rate:95.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:15
Average Award Cycle:41 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541513
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Strategic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence