Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Strategic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Strategic Applied Sciences holds $18.5M in lifetime obligations with a 95.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Strategic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $18.5M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Strategic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 95.9%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Strategic Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Army
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Strategic Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$18.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$7.5M
Recompete Win Rate:95.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:15
Average Award Cycle:41 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541513
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Strategic Applied Sciences
UEI: WFR0E8V3CASH • Washington, ME
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX