Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Strategic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Strategic Applied Sciences holds $47.3M in lifetime obligations with a 78.8% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

Strategic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $47.3M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
Strategic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 78.8%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
Strategic Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Strategic Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$47.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$16.0M
Recompete Win Rate:78.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:23
Average Award Cycle:46 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):236220
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Strategic Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence