Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Strategic Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Strategic Applied Sciences holds $203.1M in lifetime obligations with a 78.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Strategic Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $203.1M

•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B

•Strategic Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 78.0%

•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%

•Strategic Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Navy

•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Strategic Applied Sciences

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$203.1M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$83.3M

Recompete Win Rate:78.0%

Active Prime Task Orders:161

Average Award Cycle:58 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):336413

Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B

Recompete Win Rate:89.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:221

Average Award Cycle:54 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512