Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Strategic Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Strategic Consulting Group holds $22.3M in lifetime obligations with a 85.4% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

Strategic Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $22.3M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
Strategic Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 85.4%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
Strategic Consulting Group Top Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Strategic Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$22.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.1M
Recompete Win Rate:85.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:15
Average Award Cycle:40 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):621111
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Strategic Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence