Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Strategic Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Strategic Consulting Group holds $37.3M in lifetime obligations with a 81.4% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Strategic Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $37.3M

•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B

•Strategic Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 81.4%

•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%

•Strategic Consulting Group Top Agency: Federal Aviation Administration

•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Strategic Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$37.3M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$8.5M

Recompete Win Rate:81.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:21

Average Award Cycle:46 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):334220

Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B

Recompete Win Rate:89.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:221

Average Award Cycle:54 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512