Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Strategic Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Strategic Consulting Group holds $15.9M in lifetime obligations with a 80.3% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Strategic Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $15.9M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Strategic Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 80.3%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Strategic Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Defense
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Strategic Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$15.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$5.0M
Recompete Win Rate:80.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:17
Average Award Cycle:34 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):332993
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Strategic Consulting Group
UEI: 54N675WCSKMA • Washington, IA
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX