Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Strategic Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Strategic Consulting Group holds $15.9M in lifetime obligations with a 80.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Strategic Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $15.9M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Strategic Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 80.3%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Strategic Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Defense
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Strategic Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$15.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$5.0M
Recompete Win Rate:80.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:17
Average Award Cycle:34 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):332993
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512