Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Strategic Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Strategic Engineering Group holds $12.5M in lifetime obligations with a 88.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Strategic Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $12.5M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Strategic Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 88.6%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Strategic Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Air Force

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Strategic Engineering Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$12.5M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$5.6M

Recompete Win Rate:88.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:7

Average Award Cycle:37 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):336992

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512