Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Strategic Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Strategic Engineering Group holds $12.5M in lifetime obligations with a 88.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Strategic Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $12.5M

•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B

•Strategic Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 88.6%

•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%

•Strategic Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Air Force

•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Strategic Engineering Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$12.5M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$5.6M

Recompete Win Rate:88.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:7

Average Award Cycle:37 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):336992

Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B

Recompete Win Rate:89.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:221

Average Award Cycle:54 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512