Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Strategic Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Strategic Engineering Group holds $19.5M in lifetime obligations with a 92.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Strategic Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $19.5M

•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B

•Strategic Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 92.6%

•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%

•Strategic Engineering Group Top Agency: Federal Aviation Administration

•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Strategic Engineering Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$19.5M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$5.8M

Recompete Win Rate:92.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:25

Average Award Cycle:34 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):518210

Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B

Recompete Win Rate:89.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:221

Average Award Cycle:54 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512