Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Strategic Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Strategic Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Strategic Engineering Group holds $42.7M in lifetime obligations with a 77.5% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Strategic Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $42.7M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Strategic Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 77.5%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Strategic Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Army

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Strategic Engineering Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$42.7M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$18.8M

Recompete Win Rate:77.5%

Active Prime Task Orders:27

Average Award Cycle:48 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):336611

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512